Business Problem vs Brand Problem

The Branding Myth: Why Not Every Business Problem is a "Brand Problem"

In today’s hyperconnected world, LinkedIn and other professional platforms are teeming with marketing advice, thought leadership, and expert opinions on what makes or breaks a business. However, one narrative seems to dominate these discussions, especially when companies face financial crises: “They messed up the brand.”

It’s a convenient, catch-all diagnosis that reduces complex business issues into a single, tidy explanation. But as we dig deeper into the reasons behind some major corporate failures, it becomes increasingly clear that branding isn’t always the culprit. In fact, this "branding-first" mentality can oversimplify the intricate realities that businesses face.

Let’s look at some high-profile examples of companies that filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy—often seen as a symbol of business collapse—and break down why the problems run deeper than a simple branding misstep.

Tupperware: A Victim of Outdated Distribution, Not Brand Failure

Tupperware—a household name synonymous with plastic storage solutions—didn’t file for bankruptcy because it had a weak brand. On the contrary, Tupperware's brand equity was solid, built over decades of trust and familiarity. So what went wrong?

Outdated distribution model. Tupperware clung to its traditional direct-selling approach, relying on Tupperware parties and consultants when consumer purchasing behavior had shifted dramatically toward online shopping. Compounding the issue was the growing demand for sustainable alternatives, with premium customers turning away from plastic products in favor of more eco-friendly solutions.

Finally, rising supply chain costs inflated the price of goods, further diminishing their appeal. Yet, many LinkedIn posts chalked up the company’s downfall to a supposed "brand failure." In reality, it was a combination of operational and strategic issues that led to their struggles.

Bed Bath & Beyond: The Lack of Distribution, Not Brand

Similarly, Bed Bath & Beyond didn’t file for Chapter 11 because it “messed up the brand.” It wasn’t a brand issue at all—it was a distribution problem. Unlike competitors who embraced omnichannel retailing—building strong physical and digital presences—Bed Bath & Beyond lagged behind. It didn’t have the infrastructure to compete with the likes of Amazon or even more agile physical retailers.

What killed Bed Bath & Beyond wasn’t its brand; it was the inability to keep up with rivals who leveraged both digital dominance and physical footprint to outpace the company.

Party City: Not a Brand Problem, But a Perfect Storm of Challenges

Party City’s downfall was a case of bad timing and bad luck. Sure, branding wasn’t Party City’s strong suit, but it wasn’t the root cause of their bankruptcy. They filed because:

1. COVID-19 led to a steep drop in in-store foot traffic, slashing revenue.
2. A helium shortage hit their balloon business hard—one of their most profitable product lines.
3. Competition from big-box retailers and online giants like Amazon squeezed their margins even further.

Despite these clear challenges, many LinkedIn discussions pointed back to a "branding issue." In truth, Party City was more of a victim of circumstance than poor branding.

L’Occitane: Expensive Rent, Not Brand Woes

L’Occitane, a luxury beauty brand, didn’t file for bankruptcy due to a mismanaged brand. The real issue lay in its unsustainable retail strategy and sky-high rental costs. They expanded their physical footprint in prime locations, incurring enormous overhead that became impossible to cover. When consumer behavior shifted toward online shopping, those high-rent locations became a burden they couldn’t maintain.

The brand itself remained strong, synonymous with quality products and French luxury, but the failure to adapt its business model and rein in real estate costs led to its financial troubles.

Nike’s Shares Didn’t Fall Because of Brand Problems

Even a juggernaut like Nike isn’t immune to being misunderstood. When their stock fell, countless voices on LinkedIn pointed to a “brand issue” when, in reality, it was a combination of distribution mishaps, internal organizational challenges, and product innovation delays. Nike’s brand is one of the most valuable in the world; their short-term struggles were due to operational inefficiencies, not because their branding faltered.

The Problem with the LinkedIn "Brand Fixation"

The common thread here is that LinkedIn often reduces the intricate challenges companies face into a simple narrative about branding. This creates a false sense of clarity, implying that fixing the brand alone would have averted these crises. In reality, businesses are complex ecosystems where success or failure depends on a multitude of factors—from supply chain efficiency and distribution strategy to innovation pipelines and financial management.

Branding is, of course, important. It’s the emotional and visual connection a company has with its customers. But it is far from the only piece of the puzzle. Sometimes, the brand can be in perfect shape, but the company still falters due to issues entirely unrelated to its perception in the market.

Holistic Business Analysis: The Way Forward

The takeaway is this: Branding is just one of many factors that determine a company's fate. As professionals, marketers, and thought leaders, it’s crucial to approach business problems with a holistic mindset. Oversimplifying everything to "brand problems" undermines the complexity of business operations and, frankly, makes us look a bit witch-doctory.

By digging deeper into the root causes of business struggles—whether it’s outdated models, supply chain inefficiencies, or competitive pressures—we can provide more valuable insights and solutions.

So next time you see a company stumble, resist the urge to diagnose a "brand problem." More often than not, the answer lies in the less glamorous aspects of business—things like strategy, logistics, and market fit. Let’s aim for deeper analysis and move away from simplistic, branding-first diagnoses.

Conclusion: Not Every Failure is a Brand Failure

While branding plays a vital role in a company's success, it isn’t the only factor. Businesses can face operational, strategic, or market-driven challenges that branding alone cannot fix. The myth that every business failure stems from a brand problem is not only misleading but also prevents meaningful discourse on the real issues companies face. Let’s move beyond the buzzwords and delve into the true complexities of why businesses succeed or fail.

Additional Reading